Argumentation-based dialogues for agent co-ordination

Argumentation-based dialogues for agent o-ordination

Argumentation and Artifact for Dialogue Support

Intelligent and autonomous software agents may engage in dialogue and argument with one another, and much recent research has considered protocols, architectures and frameworks for this. Just as with human dialogues, such agent dialogues may be facilitated by the presence of a mediator, able to summarise different positions, identify common assumptions and inconsistencies, and make appropriate ...

Agent dialogues and argumentation

Agents have different interests and desires. Agents also hold different beliefs and assumptions. To accomplish tasks jointly, agents need to better convey information between each other and facilitate fair negotiations. In this thesis, we investigate agent dialogue systems developed with the Assumption-Based Argumentation (ABA) framework. In our system, agents represent their beliefs and desire...

Argumentation Dialogues for Two-Agent Conflict Resolution

We present a method for (two) agents to resolve conflicts amongst themselves, when these conflicts arise from the agents suggesting different realizations of the same goal. The method uses generalpurpose dialogues to allow agents to exchange views. These are in the form of rules, assumptions and contraries of assumptions, in the format underlying Assumption-Based Argumentation (ABA). Thus, the ...

On the Interplay between Games, Argumentation and Dialogues

Game theory, argumentation and dialogues all address problems concerning inter-agent interaction, but from different perspectives. In this paper, we contribute to the study of the interplay between these fields. In particular, we show that by mapping games in normal form into structured argumentation, computing dominant solutions and Nash equilibria is equivalent to computing admissible sets of...